Summarised answers at the top of a results page are no longer an experiment. For informational queries they often fully satisfy the user, which means fewer sessions reach the underlying pages.
Where clicks still happen
- Comparison and pricing pages. Users want to see options side by side rather than a single sentence.
- Anything requiring verification. When the stakes are financial, legal or medical, people open the source.
- Transactions. No summary completes a purchase.
- Original data. A number that exists on one page cannot be substituted by a summary of it.
Writing for extraction
Pages that get cited share a recognisable shape. Each section answers one question. The answer appears in the first sentence rather than at the end of a long build-up. Headings describe content instead of teasing it. Dates and author information are visible, not buried in metadata.
The measurement problem
Impression counts in these surfaces are inconsistent, and the referral that an AI answer produces is frequently untagged. Treat the channel as real but unmeasurable, and avoid optimising against a metric that does not reliably exist yet.
A defensible strategy
Keep publishing material that a model cannot reconstruct from other sources: first-hand testing, primary data, niche expertise. Commodity explanations will be absorbed into summaries. Proprietary detail will not.
Comments (0)
Log in to join the discussion
Log InNo comments yet